Research Article

Sustainable Design and Innovation: Analyzing the Application of Green Creativity in Products and Services

Qiao Liang 1 *
More Detail
1 Nanchang Vocational University,Nanchang 330004, China* Corresponding Author
Innovation on Design and Culture, 4(1), 2025, 16-21, https://doi.org/10.35745/idc2025v04.01.0002
Submitted: 05 June 2024, Published: 30 March 2025
OPEN ACCESS   12 Views   8 Downloads
Download Full Text (PDF)

ABSTRACT

In the contemporary market, dominated by a proliferation of homogeneous products, the differentiation strategy and localization traits of cultural goods are increasingly becoming crucial for distinguishing brand characteristics and enhancing market competitiveness. This approach not only accentuates the uniqueness of cultural products but also promotes an emotional resonance between consumers and these products, thus intensifying emotional consumption. This study investigates how key elements from local cultures and characteristics can be extracted and transformed into product design attributes that forge emotional connections. To this end, the study integrates the Evaluation Grid Method (EGM) with Kano regression analysis to identify consumer preferences for various cultural design attributes. An in-depth analysis of how local elements and features, such as the 'genius loci,' are emotionally embedded within product design, unveils their role in strengthening the bond between the products, the land, and the culture, thereby enhancing consumer identification and emotional engagement. The application of Kano regression analysis yields deeper insights, pinpointing which cultural design attributes are crucial for elevating consumer satisfaction and preference, and thus providing novel directions for the design and innovation strategies of cultural products. The findings of this research not only facilitate a deeper understanding of consumer needs among brands and designers but also substantiate the creation of richer emotional consumption experiences.

CITATION (APA)

Liang, Q. (2025). Sustainable Design and Innovation: Analyzing the Application of Green Creativity in Products and Services. Innovation on Design and Culture, 4(1), 16-21. https://doi.org/10.35745/idc2025v04.01.0002

REFERENCES

  1. Bissing-Olson, M. J., Iyer, A., Fielding, K. S., & Zacher, H. (2013). Relationships between daily affect and pro-environmental behavior at work: The moderating role of pro-environmental attitude. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34(2), 156–175. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1787
  2. Chan, R. Y. K. (2001). Determinants of Chinese consumers' green purchase behavior. Psychology & Marketing, 18(4), 389–421. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.1013
  3. Cheung, L. T., Fok, L., & Tsang, E. P. (2017). Understanding geopark visitors' preferences and willingness to pay for global geopark label products. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 25(12), 1838–1855. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2016.1270952
  4. Dangelico, R. M., & Pujari, D. (2010). Mainstreaming green product innovation: Why and how companies integrate environmental sustainability. Journal of Business Ethics, 95(3), 471–486. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0434-0
  5. Froschauer, E., Seidel, V. P., & Chasin, F. (2020). The role of user experience in sustainable digital transformation: Evidence from the sharing economy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 251, 119614. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119614
  6. Hartmann, P., & Apaolaza, V. (2012). Consumer attitude and purchase intention toward green energy brands: The roles of psychological benefits and environmental concern. Journal of Business Research, 65(9), 1254–1263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.11.012
  7. Kano, N., Seraku, N., Takahashi, F., & Tsuji, S. (1984). Attractive quality and must-be quality. Journal of the Japanese Society for Quality Control, 14(2), 39–48.
  8. Kim, Y., & Choi, S. M. (2005). Antecedents of green purchase behavior: An examination of collectivism, environmental concern, and PCE. Advances in Consumer Research, 32, 592–599.
  9. Kollmuss, A., & Agyeman, J. (2002). Mind the gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? Environmental Education Research, 8(3), 239–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620220145401
  10. Kumar, P., & Ghodeswar, B. (2015). Factors affecting consumers' green product purchase decisions. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 33(3), 330–347. https://doi.org/10.1108/MIP-03-2014-0062
  11. Lin, P. C., & Huang, Y. H. (2012). The influence factors on choice behavior regarding green products based on the theory of consumption values. Journal of Cleaner Production, 22(1), 11–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.10.005
  12. Luchs, M. G., Naylor, K., Irwin, J. R., & Raghunathan, R. (2010). The sustainability liability: Potential negative effects of ethicality on product preference. Journal of Marketing, 74(5), 18–31. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.74.5.018
  13. Matzler, K., & Hinterhuber, H. H. (1998). How to make product development projects more successful by integrating Kano's model of customer satisfaction into quality function deployment. Technovation, 18(1), 25–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4972(97)00072-2
  14. Mostafa, M. M. (2007). Gender differences in Egyptian consumers' green purchase behaviour: The effects of environmental knowledge, concern and attitude. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 31(3), 220–229. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1470-6431.2006.00544.x
  15. Sauerwein, E., Bailom, F., Matzler, K., & Hinterhuber, H. H. (1996, February 19-23). The Kano model: How to delight your customers. In Proceedings of the 9th International Working Seminar on Production EconomicsIgls, Tyrol, Austria: Elsevier.
  16. Ting, S., & Chen, C. (2002). The asymmetrical and non-linear effects of store quality attributes on customer satisfaction. Total Quality Management, 13(4), 547–569. https://doi.org/10.1080/09544120220149359